Is Magnafolate® better than Amorphous type L-MTHF Ca? Why? Could you decrease Magnafolate® to the same price as Amorphous type? If not, why?
Yes, Magnafolate® is better than Amorphous type. More stable and more safer.
We can’t decrease Magnafolate® to the same price as Amorphous type.
Amorphous type L-MTHF Ca is developed in 1960s, it doesn’t solve its unstable defect fundamentally. While Magnafolate® is developed C crystal in 2012, thus solve its unstable defect completely.
For the ingredient stability, we do a 60-days exposure to room temperature air, the result shows Magnafolate® is more stable than Amorphous type. Amorphous type degraded by 23.2% while Maganfolate® degraded by 0.55%. For the finished products stability, we also authorize a Swiss third party to help us to test their stability in finished products. The result also showed Magnafolate® has better stability than Amorphous type.
Magnafolate® is much safer than Amorphous type. Amorphous type is more easier to degrade, thus the harmful things will increase. Then it is not safe for our body to use.
Magnafolate® has the C crystal patent patented and some scientific data support, believe it is beneficial for your marketing, while Amorphous type has nothing.

Español
Português
русский
Français
日本語
Deutsch
tiếng Việt
Italiano
Nederlands
ภาษาไทย
Polski
한국어
Svenska
magyar
Malay
বাংলা ভাষার
Dansk
Suomi
हिन्दी
Pilipino
Türkçe
Gaeilge
العربية
Indonesia
Norsk
تمل
český
ελληνικά
український
Javanese
فارسی
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
नेपाली
Burmese
български
ລາວ
Latine
Қазақша
Euskal
Azərbaycan
Slovenský jazyk
Македонски
Lietuvos
Eesti Keel
Română
Slovenski
मराठी
Srpski језик 







Online Service